Files
website/_drafts/2018-07-25-footnotes-1---me-3---never--7.markdown
2020-07-14 19:44:26 +01:00

57 lines
1.7 KiB
Markdown
Raw Permalink Blame History

This file contains invisible Unicode characters

This file contains invisible Unicode characters that are indistinguishable to humans but may be processed differently by a computer. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

---
layout: post
title: "Footnotes[1]? Me[3]? Never.[7]"
date: 2018-07-25
---
Footnotes[1]? Me[3]? Never.[7]
Seriously though. Flying spaghetti monster tentai?! Thats Rule 34[19] for you[4] I suppose…
[1] I am persistently reminded, whenever I see the word footnote, of Sir Terry[2]. Which is decidedly melancholy.[5] (Because of [2] Otherwise it would be wonderful!)
[2] GNU STP
[3] No, you [4]
[4] Yes, you[14]
[5] Or at the very least, bittersweet. As so many things are…[6]
[6] Such is Life, I suppose[2]
[7] Okay, perhaps I have been known to use one or two[8][9]
[8] …a couple, at most.[9]
[9] Several[10][11]
[10] Okaaaay, lots[11]
[11] In actual fact it appears Ive succumbed fully to the footnote[1] infection.[12][13]
[12] If I hadnt already, this was certainly the last straw.[13]
[13] Although, this is all very linear…at the moment…[17]
[14] Speaking of *you[16] *how the devil do you make the footnotes[1] actually superscript, rather than the silly square bracket nonsense?[15]
[15] Yes, I know I could Google it.[3]
[16] I seem to have been doing rather a lot of that lately. Absence makes the…nah. Definitely not! Just happenstance…
[17] Please do note the irony in the footnote[1] about linearity[18] being part of a diverging. Did I really need to point that out? I should hope not.
[18] TIL that thats a word!
[19] 34, of course, being the only apparent rule of the Internet…
I could have carried on for ages but to be quite frank I just cant be *bothered* anymore…
EDIT: An aside[1][2]this is the only time Medium has auto tagged properly. Curious.
[1] Not a footnote
[2] Should footnotes reset down here? Probably. But I want to refer to the previous ones so…maybe not. Bah. Anyway…