---
layout:	post
title:	"Footnotes[1]? Me[3]? Never.[7]"
date:	2018-07-25
---

  Footnotes[1]? Me[3]? Never.[7]

Seriously though. Flying spaghetti monster tentai?! That’s Rule 34[19] for you[4] I suppose…

[1] I am persistently reminded, whenever I see the word ‘footnote’, of Sir Terry[2]. Which is decidedly melancholy.[5] (Because of [2] Otherwise it would be wonderful!)

[2] GNU STP

[3] No, you [4]

[4] Yes, you[14]

[5] Or at the very least, bittersweet. As so many things are…[6]

[6] Such is Life, I suppose[2]

[7] Okay, perhaps I have been known to use one or two[8][9]

[8] …a couple, at most.[9]

[9] Several[10][11]

[10] Okaaaay, lots[11]

[11] In actual fact it appears I’ve succumbed fully to the footnote[1] infection.[12][13]

[12] If I hadn’t already, this was certainly the last straw.[13]

[13] Although, this is all very linear…at the moment…[17]

[14] Speaking of *you[16] *how the devil do you make the footnotes[1] actually superscript, rather than the silly square bracket nonsense?[15]

[15] Yes, I know I could Google it.[3]

[16] I seem to have been doing rather a lot of that lately. Absence makes the…nah. Definitely not! Just happenstance…

[17] Please do note the irony in the footnote[1] about linearity[18] being part of a diverging. Did I really need to point that out? I should hope not.

[18] TIL that that’s a word!

[19] 34, of course, being the only apparent rule of the Internet…

I could have carried on for ages but to be quite frank I just can’t be *bothered* anymore…

EDIT: An aside[1][2] — this is the only time Medium has auto tagged properly. Curious.

[1] Not a footnote

[2] Should footnotes reset down here? Probably. But I want to refer to the previous ones so…maybe not. Bah. Anyway…