From ddc23ce4e5973a00ed8d17a6f3b89559db8fab22 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: FreneticScribbler Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2019 00:58:35 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] FIX: Prefix field still too limited for legacy data Fingers crossed this works I don't have the actual data locally... I know I'm making a mess but needs must. I genuinely hate whoever decided prefixes were a good idea now. --- ...uto_20191205_1937_squashed_0009_auto_20191205_2041.py | 9 ++------- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/assets/migrations/0008_auto_20191205_1937_squashed_0009_auto_20191205_2041.py b/assets/migrations/0008_auto_20191205_1937_squashed_0009_auto_20191205_2041.py index dd2d89e2..edddb178 100644 --- a/assets/migrations/0008_auto_20191205_1937_squashed_0009_auto_20191205_2041.py +++ b/assets/migrations/0008_auto_20191205_1937_squashed_0009_auto_20191205_2041.py @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ class Migration(migrations.Migration): migrations.AddField( model_name='asset', name='asset_id_prefix', - field=models.CharField(default='', max_length=5), + field=models.CharField(default='', max_length=8), ), migrations.RunPython( code=forwards, @@ -56,10 +56,5 @@ class Migration(migrations.Migration): model_name='asset', name='asset_id', field=models.CharField(max_length=15, unique=True), - ), - migrations.AlterField( - model_name='asset', - name='asset_id_prefix', - field=models.CharField(default='', max_length=8), - ), + ) ]